| |
> Over at the last rtlToronto dinner meeting, Chris announced he's down to
> 27.6 seconds.
OK, first off, I really was trying to be discreet and i only told Dave.
if other over heard than that is not announcing. second, since we are
now all in the open, I am down to 26.6.
lastly, Bruce made an observation that Calum and i hashed out.
depending on how someone solves for the X, the anti X time is just a
marker for comparison. you might have a bot that can solve the X in 30
seconds and think that is not fast compared to 23, BUT if your robot
solves in a different sequence, then you just might win over other
robots.
PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE, bring your robot with whatever time you have.
Your anti-X time is only valid against other robots solving the anti-X.
the real contest that day will not have the anti-x as a start pattern.
Sorry, Bruce, you can not hard code that solution into your robot.
:)
--
Chris
Pretend this says something funny
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: X-Bot times
|
| (...) Over at the last rtlToronto dinner meeting, Chris announced he's down to 27.6 seconds. Derek later mentioned he's estimating a ~20 second completion time for his design if everything works out. Of course, Calum's Topiary Garden(X) will (...) (23 years ago, 14-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
