To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.org.ca.rtltorontoOpen lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Organizations / Canada / rtlToronto / 3565
3564  |  3566
Subject: 
Re: 64 nested if's status
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
Date: 
Sat, 9 Feb 2002 22:24:46 GMT
Viewed: 
922 times
  
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Chris Magno writes:
WELL,

dinner was very productive for me.  i learned a TON of stuff.  I want to
give credit where credit is due, but for the life of me i forgot who
suggested to me that IF i rearranged my if statements than my robot
could be a bit more efficient in block placement.

I think that was Mario...

So i did it.  I went home and re-coded all the if's.  I ran over 14
tests of a set pattern, both before and after the new if's and the
results are encouraging.   i shaved off  0.1 second

:)

wow. NOW i need to find about 7 more seconds to feel safe against other
robot claims.

I might just have to go back and look at the hardware.

BTW Derek, A quick looks shows that maybe  you were right about why my
robot sometimes hangs.  I'm looking into squeezing one more task into
the code to create an auto re-set.



Ben

pretend that Derek's robot can beat Chris' time by at least 2 seconds... :)



Message is in Reply To:
  64 nested if's status
 
WELL, dinner was very productive for me. i learned a TON of stuff. I want to give credit where credit is due, but for the life of me i forgot who suggested to me that IF i rearranged my if statements than my robot could be a bit more efficient in (...) (23 years ago, 9-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

2 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR