Subject:
|
Re: How many transfer Opening - R20
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Mon, 23 Jan 2006 22:09:02 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
824 times
|
| |
|
|
David Koudys wrote:
> In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Chris Magno wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
>
> > Who says you have to have a EOAT that lives out side 7 TO's???
> >
> > Why cant you use a EOAT that "shoot" through one of YOUR TO's?
> >
> >
> > now you have all this space INSIDE 6 or 7 TO's?
> >
> > ;)
> >
> >
> > Chris
>
>
> Sure I thought of that--but then you have to get your TO AND your EOAT to line
> up with the other 'bot's TO.
>
> I'd rather just line up the EOAT with the other 'bot's TO.
>
> Of course, if your EOAT is permanently behind only one of your TO's, then
> there's no issue, except if another 'bot's trying to transfer to your TO at the
> same time your EOAT is trying to transfer to it--the blocks would interfere with
> one another...
>
> But again,. I'm known for thinking of weird issues...
>
> :)
>
> Dave K
In my mind, I see a block shooter like Dereks, but smaller, set on a
turret. then you have up to 7 TO's to shoot out of.
Chris
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: How many transfer Opening - R20
|
| In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Chris Magno wrote: <snip> (...) Sure I thought of that--but then you have to get your TO AND your EOAT to line up with the other 'bot's TO. I'd rather just line up the EOAT with the other 'bot's TO. Of course, if your (...) (19 years ago, 23-Jan-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
