 | | Re: this place is DEAD..... lets kick it up a notch —Chris Magno
|
| | | (...) UMmmm NO!! this is NOT for trains.... heck. i even said in my original post: "so that i dont mess up my (technic) motors. " i think DCC is a nice way to add many motors to a technics creation, and only need once pass through wire. Chris (19 years ago, 3-Oct-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: this place is DEAD..... lets kick it up a notch —David Koudys
|
| | | | In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Chris Magno wrote: <snip> (...) I'm going to give you an FYI, but if you DCC a 9v motor using the brick you're building, you get a diminished power output to the motor as oppsed to going straight 9 volts to the motor, or (...) (19 years ago, 3-Oct-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: this place is DEAD..... lets kick it up a notch —Chris Magno
|
| | | | (...) hummmm what chip did you use? this one is rated to 1 amp, and IIRC, the stall is higher. and IIRC, (some more) the stall of the technic is LOWER. we'll see. maybe this is todays project. Chris (19 years ago, 3-Oct-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: this place is DEAD..... lets kick it up a notch —Steve Hassenplug
|
| | | | (...) I doubt it's a problem with the chip. In order for the DCC to send the signal to the chip, it must send a message pulse that sometimes either goes above 9v, or goes below 9v. The RCX has a maximum output of 9v. So, to send the signal, it must (...) (19 years ago, 3-Oct-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | |
