To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.org.ca.rtltorontoOpen lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Organizations / Canada / rtlToronto / 1419
1418  |  1420
Subject: 
Re: Turntable/transfer table thoughts
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
Date: 
Wed, 20 Jun 2001 03:15:19 GMT
Viewed: 
1043 times
  
Jeff,

Those are all cool looking setups, and I'd have a hard time choosing
between them. The only thing I wanted to mention was, I noticed that
you are worried about space, especially with the curve, and I was
wondering if you were aware that you could use a straight track piece
in place of a right & left curve track combo when coming off of a
switching track. This fits perfectly into any track layout and saves one
straight track length 'width-wise', so-to-speak.
I've uploaded a gif to demonstrate what my words are lacking.
http://www3.sympatico.ca/heidi.strutt/curve_layout.gif
Just thought it might help you in your decision making.
Play well.

Tim Strutt   8^)


Jeff Van Winden wrote:

> Hi Guys,
> I need some help deciding which type of transfer/turn table to build.
> 
> Have a gander at the following pic:
> http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?i=49949
> 
> I have come up with 4 different designs, And I am not sure which one to go
> with.
> 
> A    Transfer table w/ 6 bays
>             advantages: can handle a train 3 track segments long
>             disadvantages: may have to use a 30 1/4 by 60 1/2 module.
> B    Angled Transfer table w/ 4 bays
>             advantages: can handle a train 3 track segments long, Cool
> looking triangular shaped (round house (just for Chris...)) building can be
> built for housing trains
>             disadvantages: can only handle 4 bays (2 are 2 tracks long)
> C    Transfer table w/ 5-6 bays
>         advantages: can handle a train 3 track segments long, allows for a
> fairly compact building.
>         disadvantages: may have to use a 30 1/4 by 60 1/2 module.
> D    turntable w/ 6 bays
>             advantages: Allows for an actually Round House to be built, with
> a tool shed in the middle.
>             disadvantages: can only handle a train 2 track segments long
> 
> So what do you guys think?
> Jeff



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Turntable/transfer table thoughts
 
Thanks for the advice Tim, I think I tried that theory... my main problem resides in keeping the sunken area (for the transfer/turn table) in one 301/4 x 301/4 module (for easier transportation) and accomplish this feat while using 3 track lengths (...) (25 years ago, 21-Jun-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

Message is in Reply To:
  Turntable/transfer table thoughts
 
Hi Guys, I need some help deciding which type of transfer/turn table to build. Have a gander at the following pic: (URL) have come up with 4 different designs, And I am not sure which one to go with. A Transfer table w/ 6 bays advantages: can handle (...) (25 years ago, 17-Jun-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

5 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR