Subject:
|
Re: Turntable/transfer table thoughts
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Wed, 20 Jun 2001 04:57:20 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
514 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Jeff Van Winden writes:
> A Transfer table w/ 6 bays
> advantages: can handle a train 3 track segments long
> disadvantages: may have to use a 30 1/4 by 60 1/2 module.
I like A. Consider making the table 3 long and the bays 4 to allow for a bit
of track before you go into the building (allows swinging doors to clear the
table), rather than a 4 long transfer table with only 3 track long bays.
The GMLTC transfer table was on a much bigger module and was parallel to the
main line so it took up more linear space but had a table with 4 track
segments and 5 track segment bays IIRC. (I should remember since I built the
carshop and part of the table (J1 did the final show version of the table)..
but I forget)
++Lar
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Turntable/transfer table thoughts
|
| Hi Guys, I need some help deciding which type of transfer/turn table to build. Have a gander at the following pic: (URL) have come up with 4 different designs, And I am not sure which one to go with. A Transfer table w/ 6 bays advantages: can handle (...) (23 years ago, 17-Jun-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|