 | | Re: Matter of time... —Steve Hassenplug
|
| | | (...) I have to ask this question, again, because I don't think it was really answered last time. Is the 3 minute limit a hard limit (you go over, you lose) or is it just recommended (like the rules say) so, if you go over it, people start to point (...) (21 years ago, 26-Jan-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Matter of time... —Chris Magno
|
| | | | | (...) the rule seems to suggest a soft 3 min. -------snip rule---...--- it is recommended that the robot must complete a single move in a maximum of three minutes. ---...--- which is a piss off cause ~!! I !!~ want to see a HARD 3 min. (21 years ago, 26-Jan-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Matter of time... —Calum Tsang
|
| | | | | (...) Why does it matter so much? What's your underlying concern? (...) I'm glad you like it. What's on the board for rtl16 will be even more fun. Calum (21 years ago, 26-Jan-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Matter of time... —Derek Raycraft
|
| | | | (...) From the Arbitrator's point of view, it tracks the how long each turn takes, but takes no actions based on that time. So we must watch turn time manually. Personally, if you go over the three minutes by a few seconds, I don't have a problem (...) (21 years ago, 26-Jan-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | |
