 | | Re: scan time....
|
| (...) I concur with this completely. I think my final scan scheme will be something like take 32 readings, sort into high 16 and low 16 and get an average for each group and compare the difference in the high/low average... maybe discard the top and (...) (21 years ago, 28-Dec-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, FTX)
| | | | | Re: scan time....
|
| (...) WTF??? poor form? who said this?? HUH!!!! its perfectly acceptable to run constant powered device from a batter box. DUH! Chris "It is a very clever strategy IMHO, and I applaud Chris for thinking of it." K.C. (21 years ago, 28-Dec-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| |
