Subject:
|
Re: 125 years ago...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Thu, 18 Dec 2003 13:27:07 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
584 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Chris Magno wrote:
>
>
> Ross Crawford wrote:
>
> > In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Trevyn Watson wrote:
> > > Adina and I were in the Engineering Library at Queen's, looking at bound
> > > journals, when we found Scientific American. We took the oldest book off the
> > > shelf (1879!), and opened it to a random page. On that page, we found this
> > > article:
> > >
> > > http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/tjw/misc/oldsciam.jpg
Awesome find and thanks muchly for sharing!
> > > University libraries are SO COOL!!!
> >
> > WOW! That would have been fun to see! The article doesn't mention if it actually
> > WON any games though...
> >
> > ROSCO
>
> HUH?
>
> second paragraph, second line:
>
> "...where it has played a large number of games without losing a single one."
Um... { "not losing" == "winning" } == FALSE
but { "not losing" & "not drawing" == "winning" } == TRUE
So Rosco's question is legit, although hair splitting, it's possible to get a
draw in Checkers (both sides have a single king, for example)
However I would consider an automaton that ALWAYS draws in checkers to actually
be a much harder problem to achieve than one that wins most of the time or even
one that always wins..
> must be all that down under summer heat eh? Ross?
He's right, you're wrong.. so what's your excuse? Too many diaper changes and
the fumes getting to your brain?
++Lar
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: 125 years ago...
|
| (...) Um, AND tic tac toe! I was just using checkers as an example, honest. (...) This is also true in my view of tic tac toe but not as relatively hard. (21 years ago, 18-Dec-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: 125 years ago...
|
| (...) HUH? second paragraph, second line: "...where it has played a large number of games without losing a single one." must be all that down under summer heat eh? Ross? :) Chris There's no 'I' in 'team'. There's four in 'platitude-quoting idiot'. (21 years ago, 18-Dec-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
