 | | not-too-Deep Yellow (Re: dinner is 2nd Friday!) —Steve Hassenplug
| | | | (...) I just thought I should warn anyone who is thinking about this approach... I did some quick calculations. It seems if you use the rnd(7) approach to programming, and a robot with just a little brain plays red, the rnd(7) robot will LOSE on (...) (21 years ago, 5-Dec-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: not-too-Deep Yellow (Re: dinner is 2nd Friday!) —Chris Magno
| | | | | (...) hummmm lets see, 76% - 100% equals, umm, sec..... carry the 3...... ummmm OK my RND(7) robot would have a 24% chance of beating your robot. WOW. steve if your robot would lose to me 1 in 4 times, then i gotta say that your robot sucks. Chris (21 years ago, 5-Dec-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: not-too-Deep Yellow (Re: dinner is 2nd Friday!) —Michael Purvis
| | | | | (...) More like a 24% chance of NOT LOSING BY THE FOURTH MOVE. lol Mike (21 years ago, 6-Dec-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: not-too-Deep Yellow (Re: dinner is 2nd Friday!) —Steve Hassenplug
| | | | | (...) Yes, Chris, you need to read that again. There's a 76% chance you robot won't even make four moves! In fact, 10% of the time, your third move won't even matter. Your robot has already lost. And, I haven't done all the math, but I'm pretty sure (...) (21 years ago, 6-Dec-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | | |
