|
|
 | | Re: My RCX is HAUNTED
|
| In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Ka-On Lee wrote: <snip> If we're posting Project X code--This was my favourite codeing ever-- // X-block - Runamok Design Team // Rick De Haan, David Koudys // Feb. 2002 //drive definitions //X-Axis Definitions #define (...) (21 years ago, 12-Sep-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: My RCX is HAUNTED
|
| (...) Chris, I'd just like to know whether you use BricxCC to edit your MindScript code? If you don't you might consider giving it a try. John Hansen (URL) (21 years ago, 12-Sep-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: My RCX is HAUNTED
|
| (...) DON'T GET ME STARTED on how hard C is to read. if you do not know any language. C is just crazy (for the novice) I still don't know what the hell this means: x != x_target || y != y_target AND I DON'T WANT TO !!!! I think what's this is (...) (21 years ago, 12-Sep-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: My RCX is HAUNTED
|
| (...) That code was just not elegant, but then script code are a lot harder to read than NQC. I would applaud if those code were machine generated by another code he wrote but they are not. If the target pattern is changed from X to something else (...) (21 years ago, 12-Sep-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: My RCX is HAUNTED
|
| (...) Kevin, your very humble. But I've already slandered Steve, and sang your praises in some other post. your free to heckle (anyone) Chris "It is a very clever strategy IMHO, and I applaud Chris for thinking of it." K.C. (21 years ago, 12-Sep-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
|
