 | | Re: Robot Accuracy
|
|
(...) Bruce this is just the kind of thinking I like to hear. With ideas like this I am SURE to take FIRST place. you and your temperature sensor can have 8th or 9th. just ahead of Calum and his Official lego palm tree robot. -- Chris I can see (...) (23 years ago, 15-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Robot Accuracy
|
|
(...) Dave...Dave...Dave What the heck is wrong with touch sensors?? I'd use a temperature sensor if I thought it would help. With that kind of thinking, you better get used to the concept of 3rd place (at best!)...Matthias and I will be taking (...) (23 years ago, 15-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: mother load Feb. 2002
|
|
Benjamin Medinets wrote: > (...) Is Ottawa far enough away? My parents are friendly to lego addicts (my mother even bought an RIS!), so you could come stay here :) (23 years ago, 15-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Blue screen of death
|
|
Derek Raycraft wrote: > (...) Well, NQC isn't. I dont think it optimises code like that. (23 years ago, 15-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: X-Bot times
|
|
(...) OK, first off, I really was trying to be discreet and i only told Dave. if other over heard than that is not announcing. second, since we are now all in the open, I am down to 26.6. lastly, Bruce made an observation that Calum and i hashed (...) (23 years ago, 14-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: X-Bot times
|
|
(...) hang of (...) Semaphore is the key. (23 years ago, 14-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: X-Bot times
|
|
(...) From what I've seen threading in C is nasty. At least Java was written with multi-threading in mind. Its still not pretty but I think I'm getting the hang of it. Remember everyone, bring a print out of your source code next Saturday. I'd (...) (23 years ago, 14-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: X-Bot times
|
|
(...) Hmmm.... I'm having the same problems in LegOS. You see, my robot is currently working, but if I want to speed it up, then I have to control the motors better with multitasking and motor pulsing. I have a mechanical solutionn to the accuracy (...) (23 years ago, 14-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: X-Bot times
|
|
(...) If you don't mind the precision of a tree stump, sure... Calum (23 years ago, 14-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: X-Bot times
|
|
(...) My bot can do it in 25 seconds with new batteries. May be I should look into gear up my Y or try to use LegOS. So what's the problem with touch sensors? To me they are simple and obvious solutions. (23 years ago, 14-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
