|
|
 | | Re: TTT - Question
|
| (...) I don't agree with Chris a lot, but I would say yes too. We want to encourage well tested and reliable robot hardware. I also agree with Steve's criteria for a definition of marked by having a light circle of dots to define where solid marking (...) (18 years ago, 18-Aug-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: TTT - Question
|
| (...) I would say yes. and since dave, and derek, cant post here anymore. I get there votes too. so YES a bad move is a loss. Chris (18 years ago, 18-Aug-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: [welcome to rtlIndiana]
|
| (...) tell ya what... leave me rtlToronto, and you can HAVE hamLUG. heck they are WAY closer to you than that pesky Toronto place. I here good things come from Hamilton. tell ya what I'ma gonna do. Order NOW, and I will throw in ParLUGment. but (...) (18 years ago, 18-Aug-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | TTT - Question
|
| Would a bad move equal an immediate loss? For example, if my bot failed to mark a square but signalled it was done, would that be an immediate loss? -Rob A> (18 years ago, 17-Aug-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | [welcome to rtlIndiana]
|
| (...) Sorry, that was the last straw. We're declaring that we are overthrowing the government of rtl. That's right, this is a hostile take-over. In this time of organizational turmoil, the leadership of LafLRC has decided (by a majority) to take (...) (18 years ago, 17-Aug-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
|
