| | Re: [rtlToronto] rtlToronto21 Tentative Ruleset Published
|
|
(...) Based on these results, and adding a third old gear motor, I get 0.8375 LB So, that leaves 0.1625 LB (1)(2) for sensors and parts. (3) the more I see it, the more I LIKE the 1 lb rule! beams and parts are not all that heavy, so 2 oz should be (...) (19 years ago, 29-Mar-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
|
| | Re: [rtlToronto] rtlToronto21 Tentative Ruleset Published
|
|
(...) All masses in pounds (stupid scale): RCX with batteries = 0.56 - 0.60 (depending on batteries) Two light gearmotors = 0.13 Two "old" gearmotors = 0.185 So an RCX with two motors is between 0.69 and 0.785 pounds. Not a lot of room in there. (...) (19 years ago, 29-Mar-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
|
| | Re: [rtlToronto] rtlToronto21 Tentative Ruleset Published
|
|
(...) Steve: (wrong): (...) Lar: (correct): (...) You're clearly quite confused. HTH, HAND. (19 years ago, 29-Mar-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
|
| | Re: [rtlToronto] rtlToronto21 Tentative Ruleset Published
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Chris Magno wrote (a while back): (...) Actually, this is exactly the reason I had it drilled into my head all through undergrad that you never write a number like ".453"; instead, you always include a leading zero, so (...) (19 years ago, 29-Mar-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
|
| | Re: [rtlToronto] rtlToronto21 Tentative Ruleset Published
|
|
(...) I think the drug of choice is meth in Indiana: (URL) 5. And yet, your still king of the MUPpet's? I for one... Calum (19 years ago, 29-Mar-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
|
| | Re: [rtlToronto] rtlToronto21 Tentative Ruleset Published
|
|
(...) Don't be sorry. It means I can get into the imperial beatdown again. I'm sorry to Chris for doubting his metric skills. Tim (19 years ago, 29-Mar-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
|
| | Re: [rtlToronto] rtlToronto21 Tentative Ruleset Published
|
|
(...) Hey, I never said I's good at readin or rithmatic. Turns out, my wife has everyone convinced I'm good at building robots. (...) Just a figure head. Like you. Steve ps. sorry Tim, that wasn't Chris that said 500kg=1.1lbs (19 years ago, 29-Mar-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
|
| | Re: [rtlToronto] rtlToronto21 Tentative Ruleset Published
|
|
(...) Chris, Much as I hate to intefere with an imperial beatdown (and I hate it a lot) you said 500kg(1.1pounds)... 500kg=1100pounds. You obviously meant 500g=1.1pounds though. Tim (19 years ago, 29-Mar-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
|
| | Re: [rtlToronto] rtlToronto21 Tentative Ruleset Published
|
|
(...) My error? Um, what kind of back street CRACK (1) are you on? Has all this fame affected your eyesight Steve? Can you not SEE the DECIMAL POINT before the 453???(5) 1 POUND is about zero POINT four five three Kilos (URL) ~NOW~ do you see why we (...) (19 years ago, 29-Mar-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
|
| | Re: [rtlToronto] rtlToronto21 Tentative Ruleset Published
|
|
(...) Thanks for pointing out Chris' error. (...) I don't think that's possible. (19 years ago, 29-Mar-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|