 | | Re: Gear lash....
|
| (...) Are you thinking the robot could adjust its direction on the fly? In my limited experience, precision matters when the robot is close to the TO, especially if it can cover a lot of ground in the time it takes for the sensors to come back with (...) (21 years ago, 2-Mar-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: Gear lash....
|
| (...) This is the main reason I went with two light sensors--knowing that there'll be moving 'bots and such, I wanted to 'home in' using the best and easiest possible way. using the two ight sensors as a differential, you can steer right towards any (...) (21 years ago, 2-Mar-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: Gear lash....
|
| In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Calum Tsang wrote: <snip> (...) I tried to make my wiring as tidy as possible--I only have 2 short wires left (without ripping apart my train layout) As well, you've seen the 'bot work on video, it's been tested numerous (...) (21 years ago, 2-Mar-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: Gear lash....
|
| (...) Can I ask a stupid question from a non-moving bot owner? Why do you need that much precision? The light readings are going to be pretty variable, and the robot targets and obstacles are all moving, so do you really need that much precision to (...) (21 years ago, 2-Mar-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: Gear lash....
|
| (...) Ever have one of those times where it's like "it ran outside the chassis!" then you actually install the bastard and put everything together and it stops working? Last night was one of those times. Sacha had figured out how to make the two (...) (21 years ago, 2-Mar-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
|
