 | | Re: Library and the possible strike...
|
|
(...) Caught on the news this morning that the stike/job action has been averted...sorry to fear monger :) -Rob A> (19 years ago, 23-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Library and the possible strike...
|
|
(...) I have spoken to the Library and was told they will remain open. Our booking for the space will be honoured and the activity room will be available. Phew. Thanks the reminder Rob! Calum (19 years ago, 23-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Library and the possible strike...
|
|
(...) Hey Rob, Thanks for the heads up--this is what happens when your TV diet is nothing but the Olympics and Pinks on Speed Network--you miss real news :) (URL) will contact the library tomorrow to ask if it will be open. I will also try and (...) (19 years ago, 23-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Google and rtlToronto
|
|
I just notices that if you (URL) google for rtlToronto> my site/blog is the 5th hit. Weird, eh? -Rob A> (19 years ago, 23-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, FTX)
|
| |
| | Library and the possible strike...
|
|
I know Prokect Y it is still a number of days away but... I was talking to a friend who thought that the TPL was staffed by CUPE. Do we need to consider an alternate venue in case they are (still) on strike (in which case the library would close)? (...) (19 years ago, 23-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: One more rule verification
|
|
(...) I would agree with that scoring. And I want to see your rover climb out of a (min) 5" high shell :) So go for it! I do wonder about the definition of "in" though. If you have a stationary outer shell shaped like an open 'U' with three openings (...) (19 years ago, 23-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: One more rule verification
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Calum Tsang wrote: <snip> (...) This is a pure hypothetical--I'm not saying I'm doing this or not... If there's this outside shell that has 6-8 transfer openings and there's this robot inside that comes out when we press (...) (19 years ago, 23-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: One more rule verification
|
|
(...) cough... Hassenplug.... cough. Antonishen cough... :) Chris (19 years ago, 23-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: One more rule verification
|
|
(...) I think that by leaving this option open many will build one part that goes around and dispense the blocks and the second part which can just stand in one spot and have many transfer openings. If everyone agrees to it then I'm fine with it (...) (19 years ago, 22-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: One more rule verification
|
|
(...) Well, I want to hear what others (eg Derek, RobA, Iain, Vitali) have to say, as they are more important than my opinion...but... I would take the block count inbound of the two as the greater of the two. So if Part A gets 5 unique blocks and (...) (19 years ago, 22-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
