|
|
 | | Re: Palisade Villa GBC (the start of one, anyways...)
|
| (...) Hmm, lets drop some in when Dave's not looking and find out. Derek (19 years ago, 17-Oct-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: RCX expertise
|
| In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Chris Magno wrote: <snip> (...) It's turning out to be a fantastic way for me as well (hopefully) So here's the results-- Using the 2 lights connected in series to create a cable connecting motor A to Sensor 1 and Sensor (...) (19 years ago, 17-Oct-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: RCX expertise
|
| (...) IT WAS ME!!!! i did it for my Project X it worked fantasticly as a way for my 3 RCX's to communicate. all i did was pulse the on/float thing and count the pulses. its a FANTASTIC way to do things. Chris (19 years ago, 17-Oct-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: Palisade Villa GBC (the start of one, anyways...)
|
| (...) Or the brown heads everyone got in their Random Stuff Boxes? BTW Dave, VERY VERY cool. Calum (19 years ago, 17-Oct-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: RCX expertise
|
| (...) Just like with LDCC, polarity DOES matter. One thing I played around with before C$ was connecting two sensor ports together, and switching them between active & passive modes. That means to send messages back and forth, you only use two (...) (19 years ago, 17-Oct-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
|
