 | | Re: Mating Game - moc up
|
| (...) Step back and try and sudo code something like that between two robots you control. Then consider there will we 8 or more other robots coded by different people running at the same time. Then consider the limited sensory input you have. Then (...) (21 years ago, 20-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: Mating Game - moc up
|
| (...) I agree with this, I think that by doing it this way we can get a lot of variety of different robots, and ideas. By defining small hole into which the bricks have to go into, I think that it limits the designs. I think we should be able to (...) (21 years ago, 20-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: Mating Game - moc up
|
| In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, rob.antonishen@gmail.com wrote: <snip> (...) A circumference of bumpers around the perimeter--that should be easy for Chris who has the cybermaster touch switches to differentiate on one port which bumper was pressed (I (...) (21 years ago, 20-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: Mating Game - moc up
|
| (...) I have ideas, but when you have two 'bots not facing one another, it's next to impossible for them to face each other unless there's communication between the 'bots--I mean, I can get my 'bot facing the other 'bot relatively easy, but if (...) (21 years ago, 20-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: Mating Game - moc up
|
| (...) I thought the whole concept stemmed from the of a "cooperative" game. Without inter-bot communication, the cooperative idea is kind of lost. (...) going on.... (...) I get the mental image of a group of dogs all trying to sniff each other. It (...) (21 years ago, 20-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
|
