|
|
 | | Re: Mating Game - moc up
|
| (...) Like that. I'd even go so far as to say the playfield should come with 1 box sitting somewhere in the middle to act as a "control" that performance can be measured against. -Rob A> (20 years ago, 20-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: Mating Game - moc up
|
| (...) ... (...) ... (...) So, you want to defined the exact input area, which, pretty much defines the output. Can you also tell us where the wheels & motors go? Here's my suggestion: leave the top of the input open. If someone wants to enter a box (...) (20 years ago, 20-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: Mating Game - moc up
|
| (...) Interesting, I guess this is what you were trying to get at at dinner about a standardized interface. Your right this makes it much more challenging, and interesting. Although it nullifies one of my ideas. Which is fine, just less explosive. (...) (20 years ago, 20-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: Mating Game - moc up
|
| (...) Remember, the the winning entry (as determined by the scoring system) used this rubber band "powered" mechanism: (URL) elevate and close the latch. I knew that some felt this was "cheap" (including myself), but honestly, it outperformed (...) (20 years ago, 20-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: Mating Game - moc up
|
| (...) As it turns out, a fish sticker would not win a sumo compeition. While it's a good strategy to not-lose, it would also not win very many matches, and would finish in the middle of the pack. (...) My suggestion would be a minimum weight (like 1 (...) (20 years ago, 19-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
|
