 | | Re: rtl 19 'Sumo on a stick' pictures
|
|
(...) Sure, I agree that everything there was a valid entry (maybe not a valid "robot" by my definition of "robot," but we can argue that endlessly), but are the competitions about building an interesting and clever robot, or scanning the rules for (...) (19 years ago, 11-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | BoP - OMG the carnige.
|
|
What a FANTASTIC day I've had a LOT of great time at all of past rtl Games. but this one was "fun" i cant say i have ever seen such carnage. it was GREAT!!! if i had to do it all over again, i wouldn't change a thing. A big ol' congrats go out to (...) (19 years ago, 11-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: rtl 19 'Sumo on a stick' pictures
|
|
(...) ya know.... a SIZE limit would have stopped the 5' tower bots. ~BUT~ it was MR. NO SHOW Iain, who asked for this. For what its worth.... all the types of robots were valid entries under the current rules. that means.. the GRAVITY bots, the (...) (19 years ago, 11-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: rtl 19 'Sumo on a stick' pictures
|
|
(...) Or how about: 1. No part of your robot may touch the floor at the BEGINING of the contest. 2. At least one powered motor must be used. Both these rules would prevent my dad from building me a big solid tower that just hold my end up. -Greg (19 years ago, 11-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: rtl 19 'Sumo on a stick' pictures
|
|
(...) Forgot to say, if anyone wants the full sized originals for any of these just drop me a line. -Rob A> (19 years ago, 11-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
