 | | Re: Am I the only person who finds Lego CAD systems infuriating?
|
|
(...) For whom LDD is, as you've pointed out, probably going to be the better option. (...) For whom the LDraw suite is definitely the better option. (...) Different tools for different tasks (...) Some Open Source software would have UI analysis (...) (19 years ago, 2-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: a fight at the playground
|
|
(...) c'mon - everyone knows man was created by the flying spaghetti monster... (URL) A> (19 years ago, 2-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Am I the only person who finds Lego CAD systems infuriating?
|
|
(...) I don't want to speak for anyone else, but I would have to ask the question if efficiency and memorability were that important for this CAD system. If you're building the next Airbus 380 or industrial automation, then sure, speed for the (...) (19 years ago, 2-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Am I the only person who finds Lego CAD systems infuriating?
|
|
(...) I think you're missing the point of the original post: All this LDraw talk has produced nothing to effect change on the user interface of the actual software programs which I (and several others now) have difficulty with. If you really wish to (...) (19 years ago, 2-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: a fight at the playground
|
|
(...) Ah yes, I recall - (URL) the first, inaugural, train1>, after I managed to find the place. Guess I'll just have to live with that label too then. ROSCO (19 years ago, 1-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, FTX)
|
