 | | Re: Technic MOC: DuckPro Automated Duck Assembly
|
|
(...) Iain, that is PURE GENIUS..... amazing.... can't wait to see it on saturday I would have never thought it could be THIS simple, yet work so well... And completely following my favorite engineering principle: KISS :) Great job! John (20 years ago, 25-Feb-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic MOC: DuckPro Automated Duck Assembly
|
|
(...) I can host it at Sparky's Space too! Dave K (20 years ago, 24-Feb-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic MOC: DuckPro Automated Duck Assembly
|
|
(...) phuh, whatever, it's like so 5 minutes ago. Derek -Ok it's really cool. Can't wait to see in on Saturday. Why can't life move faster, I want it to be Saturday Now! (20 years ago, 24-Feb-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic MOC: DuckPro Automated Duck Assembly
|
|
(...) (URL) (...) Nice! I'd like to make a pneumatic auto-building robot that uses only air power and no RCX. Perhaps you could dress up your robot as a large mother duck! Is it possible to make the RCX "Quack" too? Mark (20 years ago, 24-Feb-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic MOC: DuckPro Automated Duck Assembly
|
|
(...) Waaah! WHERE'S MY DUCK VIDEO!?! I want it now! OOH SHINY BIKES! I LIKE BIKES! BIKES WITH STREAMERS ON THE HANDLEBARS ARE COOL! LET'S GO RIDE BIKES WITH STREAMERS! (URL) (20 years ago, 24-Feb-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic MOC: DuckPro Automated Duck Assembly
|
|
(...) This Internet thing is not living up to it's promise. I want it now! Now! Now! I tells you! Derek (20 years ago, 24-Feb-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic MOC: DuckPro Automated Duck Assembly
|
|
(...) Jesus Christ, I don't even have the file. :) Iain, send me the file and I'll host it up on the Peach. Calum (20 years ago, 24-Feb-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic MOC: DuckPro Automated Duck Assembly
|
|
(...) Calum host the Vid! Calum host the Vid! Ah come on, host the Vid! Derek Ah, get Dave to do it, he's a nice guy. (20 years ago, 24-Feb-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic MOC: DuckPro Automated Duck Assembly
|
|
(...) Iain, Fantastic! I loved this. I never got the video to work. I'm glad you finaly went public with this. I cant wait to see some of your other non-public folders on BS. Chris (20 years ago, 24-Feb-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Technic MOC: DuckPro Automated Duck Assembly
|
|
(First of all, I hope I've set this to the proper newsgroups. I've never "announced" a project I've worked on before. So apologies in advance if I've posted to the wrong area!) I've had this idea for a few years. But I finally got around to building (...) (20 years ago, 24-Feb-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.announce, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.technic, FTX) !!
|
| |
| | Re: Pretty much punched
|
|
(...) I'm busted! Actually sadly enough "Rawk" basically works under that premise but he doesnt have such a cute bod. (...) Mmmmmmmm nothing beats shocking pink fun fur and robotics. Didn't Sue Johanson feature that last Sunday night? Janey "Red (...) (20 years ago, 24-Feb-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Pretty much punched
|
|
(...) Sounds good to me. The robots are smaller anyway, so I don't see a big issue with this. Iain (20 years ago, 24-Feb-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Pretty much punched
|
|
(...) Janey - I found your secret plans for a block bot.... (URL) I know for sure you would also appreciate the classic, pink fun-fur battle-bot (URL) ) -Rob A> (20 years ago, 24-Feb-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Pretty much punched
|
|
(...) YAY!!!!!!!! Play field is screwed!!! Wow, that's wonderful news. I knew that wishing on that shooting star would help. New suggestion...... we just line up the bots, and give points for beauty! Mmmmmm look at "Realms" all pretty in pink!! Poor (...) (20 years ago, 24-Feb-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Pretty much punched
|
|
(...) ... (...) Are ther enough tables in the library that we could assemble them into a 8x8 playfield (I believe they were a grey) taping the seams with duct tape, and just place the border frame held together with hinges on top? For a more even (...) (20 years ago, 24-Feb-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Cell Phones are OK to use in hospitals.
|
|
(...) I work in a hospital- I asked the same question... It's more about interference with telemetry than anything else, and it's mostly older equipment, but since they can't test *every* cell phone, and hospitals are dealing with high stakes... (...) (20 years ago, 24-Feb-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Pretty much punched
|
|
Yep, the old playfield is pretty much hosed. Given a few weeks and a belt sander, I'll get somehting workable, but for Saturday, not so much. I have a word out for a 9 foot by 9 foot greenhouse shading system material--it's very good at covering (...) (20 years ago, 24-Feb-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Cell Phones are OK to use in hospitals.
|
|
(...) You're right, but I basically admitted to that already. I wasn't trying to be a know-it-all but it certainly came out that way. Sorry. However, here's an article I found after my post: (URL) (20 years ago, 24-Feb-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Cell Phones are OK to use in hospitals.
|
|
(...) Where did you get your number that an average cell phone emits around 0.3 watts? Is that during paging, dormancy or in active call? More importantly, how do you know how sensitive other devices in the hospital are, and they'd be affected by (...) (20 years ago, 24-Feb-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Cell Phones are OK to use in hospitals.
|
|
(...) I wasn't trying to speak as an expert on RF radiation. It was more like the average cell phone emits ~.3 Watts which isn't nearly enough affect anything except in very close proximity. I think the hospital ban stems from that fact that the (...) (20 years ago, 23-Feb-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
