 | | Re: Laying smack (was Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company
|
|
(...) That aint no woman, that's just Janey... (smack) -Rob A> (20 years ago, 25-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Laying smack (was Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company
|
|
(...) I thought David would be good at laying down the smack. Guess I was wrong. Steve - keeping it simple - (20 years ago, 25-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Laying smack (was Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company
|
|
(...) What about... Sticky Lounge...Outrageous Sister ! Sickness Looms, Ominous Symptoms. Saucy Lugnet Outrages Sailors. Suppository Lozenge...Output Soon. (...) another bit of IPS-SO... Irate Postal Service - Significant Order. Ineffective Pathetic (...) (20 years ago, 25-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: who does chris think he is?
|
|
(...) On late-night television I saw the 'the Seven Samurai'. They were mean dudes. It was in Japanese, but it had subtitles. Oops...I'm not an admin. pete.w (or an admon even, if admon is short for admonish) (20 years ago, 25-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: who does chris think he is?
|
|
(...) I think the general idea is that Chris (and to some part myself) is threatened by the idea that those rulesetters won't make Lugnet a place where we'd want to stick around. Lugnet has been fantastic for us for a very long time, but the current (...) (20 years ago, 25-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: who does chris think he is?
|
|
(...) No, but I would expect you'd do something like this, so...carry on! :) (...) For THAT matter, I could also say Emimem or NWA made some excellent points using a LOT of profanity. What I'm trying to get across is, for the subject matter, that (...) (20 years ago, 25-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Hi there
|
|
(...) The idea was to drive a boat from one end of a pool to another, where there would be a "buoy" (aka stolen road pylon weighed down with stones) where you'd have to turn around and drive back. I think we'd allow some non-Lego stuff, probably (...) (20 years ago, 25-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: who does chris think he is?
|
|
(...) And what I'm saying is, you don't NEED to. It's like saying, should I ever NEED to blow up a small sovereign nation, I want to always have access to a nuclear weapon (since everyone likes to call it the "F-Bomb" (?!#!@#)). It should never get (...) (20 years ago, 25-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: who does chris think he is?
|
|
(...) I didn't mean to imply that profanity is always wrong. I tend to agree with Larry's view on profanity use [1] and also agree (strongly) with Kelly's view of "free speech" on LUGNET [2]. My comment wasn't meant to address what was profanity and (...) (20 years ago, 25-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: who does chris think he is?
|
|
(...) I know that the admins set the rules and I know LUGNET is "non-free" in terms of the types expression allowed but I think the above opinion is very arrogant (that's not to say that you, Tim, are arrogant since I know you are not). The above (...) (20 years ago, 25-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
