|
|
 | | RE: Calum's gonna love this
|
| (...) Dave, I really hope there are no Brits (or Aussies or Jamaicans) reading this post because you are impying that you are about to soil yourself. Of course, we know you actually need a _nap_, which is, I believe a kip across the pond. Ralph (21 years ago, 9-Aug-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: Calum's gonna love this
|
| (...) Well, if it'll encourage you to stop recycling that Kodak camera and buy a new digital camera, I'm all for it. (...) The presentation is more a kick in the pants for me to finish my thesis work by summarizing all the literature review I did, (...) (21 years ago, 10-Aug-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: Human Powered Helicopter
|
| (...) I think I meant there doesn't seem to be any commercial examples, agreeing with what Ivan posted... ...Ivan had some very specific criteria for his topic of discussion: -Non Russian -Coaxial -Commercial/Civilian -Rhymes with "orange" -Not made (...) (21 years ago, 10-Aug-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: Human Powered Helicopter
|
| (...) The tandem rotor aircraft, e.g., CH-46 Sea Knight, CH-47 Chinook, have counter-rotating rotors. KDJ ___...___ LUGNETer #203, Ontario, Canada (21 years ago, 10-Aug-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: Human Powered Helicopter
|
| (...) I think I hear my cue... ;] Those claims, out of context, are misleading/exaggerated. The aircraft is certainly affected by winds, just not in the same way or with the same unique problems as a conventional tail-rotored aircraft (although it (...) (21 years ago, 10-Aug-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
|
