 | | Re: Track on the modules
|
|
"Calum Tsang" <tsangc@mie.utoronto.ca> wrote in message news:GEFIrv.MG1@lugnet.com... (...) edge. (...) because (...) I don't see why we don't use the PNLTC specs - Geometrically they operate nicely. It would be foolish to try and run the track (...) (23 years ago, 4-Jun-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Track on the modules
|
|
(...) We are? Iain wrote me about this because the PNLTC spec calls for them specific intervals. I'm not happy with the intervals they call for, because they don't play nice with roadplates-the cut right over where the road is. I've built two (...) (23 years ago, 4-Jun-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: suction cup robot
|
|
(...) I'm glad they worked out for you! I notice people are doing bots that internalize a mechanism. On the outset of this game, I mentioned it's a different game from marbles or stacking because the game is not (or doesn't have to be) internal, ie, (...) (23 years ago, 4-Jun-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: suction cup robot
|
|
(...) That sounds really cool. is Glass the best thing it can walk up?? or any flat smooth surface?? I can't wait to see it. (23 years ago, 4-Jun-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Excited that yer excited!!!!
|
|
"Benjamin Medinets" <bmedinets@aol.com> wrote in message news:GEEwyE.Dou@lugnet.com... (...) He'll be... well, no. I'm not going to give away where he'll be. :) (...) favorite (...) Ben, you have *no* idea. Some of the rides out there now... Last (...) (23 years ago, 4-Jun-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
