|
|
 | | Re: one wire, two wire, three wire, GO
|
| (...) Sure. I will draw one up tonight. There is only one sensor per robot. When playing via arbitrator, that sensor is pushed by Robot A and is connected to Arbitrator. Arbitrator then signals Robot B to start on B's sensor port. Robot B is (...) (21 years ago, 21-Jan-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: one wire, two wire, three wire, GO
|
| (...) <MAJOR SNIPAGE> argh!!!! ok, today my brain is like a small bowl of mush. can someone do up a pretty picture with labels??? just to see if I got this: a sensor is connected to the arbitrator. but that sensor is actually located on Steve's (...) (21 years ago, 21-Jan-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: one wire, two wire, three wire, GO
|
| Oh, and that should be One Wire, Two Wire, Red Wire, Blue Wire. Derek (21 years ago, 21-Jan-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: one wire, two wire, three wire, GO
|
| (...) Unfortunately, as I pointed out in earlier posts this is not acceptable. Others have pointed out problems with connecting sensor ports together. I don't want any sensor port connected directly to my control lab. So, just like listening to your (...) (21 years ago, 21-Jan-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: one wire, two wire, three wire, GO
|
| (...) Do *I* need to explain the rules to YOU? There are two wires going between robots. YOU have a touch sensor on YOUR robot that is connected ONLY to MY sensor port. I have a touch sensor on my robot that is not connected to anything on MY robot, (...) (21 years ago, 21-Jan-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
|
