|
|
 | | Re: Quite C and BrickOS (WAS: Re: Steve H, C$, me learning C Brick OS)
|
| (...) In all honesty, if I'd seen QC first, I might've gone with it. That said, however, I feel slightly more confident using BrickOS, because I know that it was a multi-person development effort with an active community online. IE, I know I can get (...) (21 years ago, 15-Jan-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: I dont want to be a "steve"
|
| (...) you said you'd never tell!! :) :) :) :) :) :) :) i so hate you! :) :) :) :) :) Chris There's no 'I' in 'team'. There's four in 'platitude-quoting idiot'. (21 years ago, 15-Jan-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: I dont want to be a "steve"
|
| (...) Sorry I wasn't clear. In most competitions, I think the 'not lose' is more or less implied. In C$, a robot will lose if it mis-drops a chip (and signals end-of-turn). Yes, I read that as "A goal is to not lose" I suspect most people who enter (...) (21 years ago, 15-Jan-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: Quite C and BrickOS (WAS: Re: Steve H, C$, me learning C Brick OS)
|
| (...) Indeed, Calum is absolutely right. I was going to elaborate on that myself, however I was running late for lunch, so I did not bother. :)) What I was trying to say is that from my understanding BrickOS and QuiteC use the same basic type of (...) (21 years ago, 15-Jan-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: Quite C and BrickOS (WAS: Re: Steve H, C$, me learning C Brick OS)
|
| (...) Thanks for adding the Derek Raycraft version! Calum (21 years ago, 15-Jan-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
|
