|
|
 | | Re: [rtlToronto] rtlToronto15: Deep Yellow
|
| I read the rules but had a couple of questions still: 1) what colour is the rest of the playfield (i.e. neither the black nor white corners)? 2) what size are the corners? 8x8, the same as the maximum sobot size? 3) What is the anticipated marble (...) (21 years ago, 18-Dec-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: 125 years ago...
|
| (...) I wonder when the name changed to tic-tac-to? Kevin (21 years ago, 18-Dec-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: 125 years ago...
|
| (...) OH!! OK, I get it now. see, when i read this (first thing in the AM, before my cup-o-joe) I took that line to be some messed up ye oldee english for always win. but in retrospect, i guess it could also read as tie. I withdraw the heat (...) (21 years ago, 18-Dec-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: 125 years ago...
|
| (...) Um, AND tic tac toe! I was just using checkers as an example, honest. (...) This is also true in my view of tic tac toe but not as relatively hard. (21 years ago, 18-Dec-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: 125 years ago...
|
| (...) Um... { "not losing" == "winning" } == FALSE but { "not losing" & "not drawing" == "winning" } == TRUE So Rosco's question is legit, although hair splitting, it's possible to get a draw in Checkers (both sides have a single king, for example) (...) (21 years ago, 18-Dec-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
|
