To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.org.ca.obbOpen lugnet.org.ca.obb in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Organizations / Canada / OBB / 134
133  |  135
Subject: 
Re: Uh oh--Dave's got the 'moving things with magnets' bug...
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.org.ca.obb
Date: 
Thu, 10 Apr 2008 17:04:41 GMT
Viewed: 
7148 times
  
In lugnet.org.ca.obb, David Laswell wrote:
   In lugnet.org.ca.obb, David Koudys wrote:
   THere’s suppose to be a 1 plate gap between the magnet on the chain link and the bottom of the baseplate. However, if the chain is loose, the magnet pulls up so it’s touching the baseplate.

Since the magnet on the actual vehicle is ‘bricked’ right into place and the tires are pretty much solid rubber, it maintains a 1 plate distance from the baseplate.

What you showed above is a fantastic concept! However, I have bigger plans for the ‘driving around’--it may expand a bit :)

I think I wanna try your method though--for testing

http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?i=1136961

Steve Ringe came up with a solution a few years ago, which has been featured in at least half a dozen MichLUG/MichLTC shows so far (if you were at the big National Train Show in July you might have even seen them). He doesn’t seem to have them documented very well in his own Brickshelf folder, but that’s a photo he took of one of the cars driving on the roadplates. I know he uses solid plastic wheels instead of rubber tires because they turn better, but they also tear up the baseplates over time (which, given the cost of buying those Space landing plates, might be something you’d want to avoid). He also sticks to 4-wide construction so they can pass each other on turns without smacking into each other. If you’re having issues with the magnet riding the underside of the plate, you could always try using wheels on the armature to maintain a 1-plate gap. As for the rest of it, his system can be configured to match any drive path at faster speeds than your second video, but it’s up to him if he wants to let loose the secrets hidden by the baseplates.

And wait...OBB? When the heck did that happen?

Thanks for the heads up, David!

I saw something a while back where someone had train tracks running under the layout that would drag vehicles around roadplates using magnets. Dunno if that was Steves.

I’ts a fantastic setup anyway--any animation to a layout is great fun. I have a few things more in mind for this one.

Oh, and OBB is Ontario Brick Builders--is an all-encompassing thing for AFOL’s in Ontario--‘cause there’s lots of AFOLs around but they aren’t part of any particular organization.

Take care,

Dave K



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Uh oh--Dave's got the 'moving things with magnets' bug...
 
(...) That's the one. (...) His has the advantage of being a much simpler drive system than yours, but the gear system looks like it could be less troublesome in terms of following complex paths. I'm guessing it'd have trouble dealing with two-way (...) (17 years ago, 10-Apr-08, to lugnet.org.ca.obb, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Uh oh--Dave's got the 'moving things with magnets' bug...
 
(...) (URL) Ringe came up with a solution a few years ago, which has been featured in at least half a dozen MichLUG/MichLTC shows so far (if you were at the big National Train Show in July you might have even seen them). He doesn't seem to have them (...) (17 years ago, 9-Apr-08, to lugnet.org.ca.obb, FTX)

10 Messages in This Thread:


Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR