Northern Alberta LEGO Users Group : 311


Organizations / Canada / NALUG / 311	310 \| 312

Subject:	Re: Latest Larger Layout (was Re: Get-together last Sunday)
Newsgroups:	lugnet.org.ca.nalug
Date:	Fri, 27 Oct 2000 02:07:27 GMT
Viewed:	1783 times

Whoa. Hold on a minute. I'm assuming that I'm 'Adam in Calgary' right? Did I just get volunteered for something? I had replied on the mailing list ( I think ) that I didn't want to commit to anything, as I can't make plans one week ahead, never mind 4 months or whatever, because I am really busy with school. Someone want to fill me in here? ~Adam In lugnet.org.ca.nalug, Steve Chapple writes: > In lugnet.org.ca.nalug, John Koob writes: > > SRC wrote in message ... > > > In lugnet.org.ca.nalug, Steve Chapple writes: > > > Alright, here it is with some "terrain" filled in. > > > http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?i=18179 > > > > It looks good, and I just realized that the mountain is > > not on a table. Interesting... > > The tables are all there, you just have to imagine them while > following the outline, since putting the green plates tends > to hide other aspects (like buildings and mountains). :-) > > Chris wrote: > > I've just been looking at the various layout pictures. I must say I > > like the elegance of James' version. Just add one or two long passing > > sidings for full train storage, and it would be great. Does it have > > the problem of using too many tables? > > Well, by my count, James' layout Ver.2 uses 2 large and 10 small > tables, while version 3 uses 4 large and 3 small. My Oct25 uses 4 > large and 3 small. Michel said that he had six of each. > > Six large tables? Wow, that gives a lot of possibilities for large > layouts. Over 185 sq. feet! Bwhahaha If James can fit that much > plywood in his van, then we can have one massive layout at Calgary... > Between John and Kevin both "should be able but can't promise" and > Adam in Calgary (and my sister could probably help watch the table > a bit too) we should be able to pull it off, right? > > SRC

Message has 2 Replies:

		Re: Latest Larger Layout (was Re: Get-together last Sunday)
Adam Murtha wrote in message ... (...) Not by me. Maybe Steve was referring to another Adam... (...) Although I would like to go, I also can't make any guarantees, as I know I'll be busy during the time of the next show. Nevertheless, you would be (...) (24 years ago, 27-Oct-00, to lugnet.org.ca.nalug)

		Re: Latest Larger Layout (was Re: Get-together last Sunday)
(...) Don't panic. :-) I just included you as one who would like to help but can't commit to being there for sure. (John and Kevin are in a similar situation.) SRC (24 years ago, 28-Oct-00, to lugnet.org.ca.nalug)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Latest Larger Layout (was Re: Get-together last Sunday)
(...) The tables are all there, you just have to imagine them while following the outline, since putting the green plates tends to hide other aspects (like buildings and mountains). :-) Chris wrote: (...) Well, by my count, James' layout Ver.2 uses (...) (24 years ago, 26-Oct-00, to lugnet.org.ca.nalug)

116 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search