Subject:
|
Re: Latest Larger Layout (was Re: Get-together last Sunday)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.nalug
|
Date:
|
Thu, 26 Oct 2000 16:18:49 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1497 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.nalug, John Koob writes:
> SRC wrote in message ...
> > In lugnet.org.ca.nalug, Steve Chapple writes:
> > Alright, here it is with some "terrain" filled in.
> > http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?i=18179
>
> It looks good, and I just realized that the mountain is
> not on a table. Interesting...
The tables are all there, you just have to imagine them while
following the outline, since putting the green plates tends
to hide other aspects (like buildings and mountains). :-)
Chris wrote:
> I've just been looking at the various layout pictures. I must say I
> like the elegance of James' version. Just add one or two long passing
> sidings for full train storage, and it would be great. Does it have
> the problem of using too many tables?
Well, by my count, James' layout Ver.2 uses 2 large and 10 small
tables, while version 3 uses 4 large and 3 small. My Oct25 uses 4
large and 3 small. Michel said that he had six of each.
Six large tables? Wow, that gives a lot of possibilities for large
layouts. Over 185 sq. feet! Bwhahaha If James can fit that much
plywood in his van, then we can have one massive layout at Calgary...
Between John and Kevin both "should be able but can't promise" and
Adam in Calgary (and my sister could probably help watch the table
a bit too) we should be able to pull it off, right?
SRC
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
116 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
