To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.org.ca.nalugOpen lugnet.org.ca.nalug in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Organizations / Canada / NALUG / 304
303  |  305
Subject: 
Re: Latest Larger Layout
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.org.ca.nalug, lugnet.trains
Date: 
Thu, 26 Oct 2000 16:45:31 GMT
Viewed: 
2292 times
  
In lugnet.org.ca.nalug, Michel Magnan writes:
It is looking promising, not sure about the practicality of
such a large mountain!

That's what I was wondering.  I notice James and Chris were silent
about being able to make a 60" x 60" mountain with four tunnels,
one of them with a spiral chamber, and all of them curved.  8-)
With enough time and bricks it would be "doable", but I realize
it's quite the challenge.

The other major problem, is that as currently drawn, it takes one
more small 30.5x30.5 table than I currently have!  I only have the
equivalent of 18 squares, from 6 large and 6 small tables.
I am glad that I am not the only one who can't count to 18!

Equivalent of 18 squares?  <does quick count/check>  Are you saying then
that the large tables are doubled in area and not doubled in dimensions?
ie. Small 30x30 and large 30x60, rather than small 30x30 and large 60x60?
<surfs over to PNLTC>  Doh!  They ARE only half as large as I thought.
<recounts layouts>   OK, then that would make JamesV2 6 large and 6 small,
JamesV3 [ http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?i=18298 ] 7 large
and 7 small, and Oct25 6 large and 7 small.  Nuts - I was so looking forward
to a 185 sq ft layout.  Oh well, back to the track drawing board.  Are we
designing for six of each or seven of each?

SRC



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Latest Larger Layout
 
OK - Here's an update using 7 large and 7 small. (URL) has all the things we're after, plus it has a feature that till now we have been missing - a section that reverses the trains! The trains stop in front of the station, so that segment switching (...) (24 years ago, 26-Oct-00, to lugnet.org.ca.nalug)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Latest Larger Layout
 
Hello Steve, It is looking promising, not sure about the practicality of such a large mountain! The other major problem, is that as currently drawn, it takes one more small 30.5x30.5 table than I currently have! I only have the equivalent of 18 (...) (24 years ago, 25-Oct-00, to lugnet.org.ca.nalug, lugnet.trains)

116 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR