 | | Re: SuperTrain 2001 layout
|
|
(...) We can incorperate a line going along a mountain ridge without much difficulty. I'd prefer to beg off the elevation changes inside the mountain. (derails...*shudder*) BTW, John - do you still have a NALUG sign built? James (26 years ago, 3-Jan-01, to lugnet.org.ca.nalug)
|
| |
| | Re: Preparation for SuperTrain 2001
|
|
(...) I also think we should put our time towards more buildings and worry less about function at this point. Function is cool & a bonus, but I'd rather have two static display pieces instead of 1 functional. (...) Hmm. Setup/takedown isn't my big (...) (26 years ago, 3-Jan-01, to lugnet.org.ca.nalug, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: Preparation for SuperTrain 2001
|
|
(...) How do you want me to do this? I have a container yard, which occupies right now 7x3 (32x32) plates. Roughly, this takes 3 tracks (plus one mainline passes through it), and there are some neat things with the containers (a overhead crane made (...) (26 years ago, 3-Jan-01, to lugnet.org.ca.nalug)
|
| |
| | Re: SuperTrain 2001 layout
|
|
(...) I've got some improvements to make - I'll post a new one soon. (...) The incline is for the bridge to "cross-over the cross-over". Vertically, there are three tracks in one place. Part of my inpiration was a great 4.5V blue layout that I have (...) (26 years ago, 3-Jan-01, to lugnet.org.ca.nalug)
|
| |
| | Re: Preparation for SuperTrain 2001
|
|
(...) Secret surprise?? If you mean the "future of LEGO trains", you'll have to wait for Mr. Justus to make his announcement. AFAIK he won't be in Calgary, but it would be cool if he were to visit. :-) (...) It can still be a great non-functioning (...) (26 years ago, 3-Jan-01, to lugnet.org.ca.nalug, lugnet.trains.org)
|
