 | | Re: Dinner?? (part deux)
|
| (...) HEY!!!! That's not nice! Maybe true, but still not nice... Geesh, so much for trying to be funny... I guess being funny is the one thing that rtl non-offical dinner posts should not be. (...) Awww, well thats very nice, what a wonderful (...) (20 years ago, 9-Jun-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: Dinner?? (part deux)
|
| (...) Awww... thats so sweet! I, too, will be at the chalet this Friday, official dinner or no Dave K (20 years ago, 8-Jun-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: Dinner?? (part deux)
|
| Janey Cook wrote: < Something in a drunken stupor, I can only assume > Regardless of whether there is an [official] dinner this Friday. I will be there for you Janey. Derek (20 years ago, 8-Jun-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: Dinner?? (part deux)
|
| (...) I assume we are, otherwise I'm going to look mighty strange sitting in a cape talking Lego to the waitress... But I must admit..... I did look for the "magic-you-aren't-au...-rtl-icon" post, even went back a few weeks... AND then.... I even (...) (20 years ago, 8-Jun-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: Dinner?? (part deux)
|
| You know I think there's a web site you can check. Derek p.s. It's Dot COM. (...) (20 years ago, 8-Jun-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
|
