Subject:
|
Re: Sorting LegOz meetings once and for all...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.au
|
Date:
|
Tue, 21 Nov 2000 04:18:16 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1019 times
|
| |
|
|
I know this has been discussed before but I think we need to resolve the
numbering system for meetings if LegOz is to appear to be a cohesive
group. There was a recentl discussion(1) about starting a National web
page and if it is to announce meetings or anything like that they have
to be organised in a useful manner.
(1) http://news.lugnet.com/loc/au/?n=3576)
Now that we have at least 4 cities arranging LegOz meetings around
Australia, I feel that the incremental numbering system that was fine
for Sydney and Melbourne is becoming too difficult to use. It's only a
matter of time before too cities have meetings on the same day (I
believe that there was one day between Brisbane's first meet and a
Melbourne meet).
I propose we divide the meeting between either states or regions. If we
use regions then we allow for the fact that some of the larger towns and
cities outside the capitals could arrange something if so desired. Under
this scheme we would have regions such as Mel (Melbourne), Syd, SEQ
(S.E. Qld encompassing Brisbane and the Gold Coast), Hob, Ade, Per etc.
Any meeting would then look like:
LegOz Mel.3.2001 which would also serve to show where it is in the
header.
Please comment on this and let's get our Postcodes working.
Tim
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Sorting LegOz meetings once and for all...
|
| I know this has been discussed before but I think we need to resolve the numbering system for meetings if LegOz is to appear to be a cohesive group. There was a recentl discussion(1) about starting a National web page and if it is to announce (...) (24 years ago, 21-Nov-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
