 | | Re: Close Encounters
|
| Sorry about my sleep deprived crosspostings last week: at least it seemed to boost the .loc.au traffic . I liked the following the best: In lugnet.org.au, David Low snips: (...) Does Club 2390 or a variant appeal to anyone else? --DaveL (24 years ago, 13-Nov-00, to lugnet.org.au, lugnet.loc.au)
| | | | | Re: Close Encounters
|
| (...) Personally I didn't see the problem with STUDS as a name. I can see that in a general context, it might be construed as being an all-male group who think they are God's Gift To Women. However, in the context of Lego, is there really a (...) (24 years ago, 13-Nov-00, to lugnet.org.au, lugnet.loc.au)
| | | | | How to be a STUD Re: Close Encounters
|
| (...) I think that the studious (NPI[1]) avoidance of any photos of people from any of our meets should give the lie to the thought that we are paragons of male form. OTOH we are all pretty keen on Lego (even those of us that sully themselves by (...) (24 years ago, 13-Nov-00, to lugnet.org.au, lugnet.loc.au)
| | | | | Re: Close Encounters
|
| (...) What about Club 0937? Upside down Miss Jane! Braith (24 years ago, 13-Nov-00, to lugnet.org.au, lugnet.loc.au)
| | | | | Re: Close Encounters
|
| (...) Yes, Mr Squiggle! (24 years ago, 14-Nov-00, to lugnet.org.au, lugnet.loc.au)
| |
