To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.test.fooOpen lugnet.off-topic.test.foo in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Testing / Foo / *197 (-20)
  Re: flag of Foo
 
(...) 01001100011000010111...1100100001 TOS THAT!!!! I was all prepared to let this binary thing die, you flashing chaper 8 really made me mad. (madder than when I laundered my 8480) come on. I'm not going to play lawyer and dig in the munituia of (...) (21 years ago, 9-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo)
 
  Re: flag of Foo
 
(...) satisfactory (to me) resolution of your ToS violation question :-) (21 years ago, 9-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo)
 
  flag of Foo
 
I think the top picture here should be our official flag: (URL) (21 years ago, 9-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo)
 
  Re: S P A C E ! !
 
(...) * L * M * A * O * ! ! ! And I mean I’m REALLY laughing my ass off right now! Ok, ok, I have to stop now; my boss is giving me some odd looks and probably thinks I went loopy. Either way I’m about to get fired :)) Ahhh... that sure was a good (...) (21 years ago, 9-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo)
 
  Re: S P A C E ! !
 
(...) For some reason a plain Copy->Paste does not excite me in the ways it used to... just like mocking Larry – it’s so easy you loose any interest in it pretty fast. And just so you know Chris, there *is* a pretty cool prize for decoding my (...) (21 years ago, 9-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo)
 
  Re: S P A C E ! !
 
(...) You just answered your own question. encoded is not plain text and therefore "non-plain-text content" (...) Not relevant. "including but not limited to" (...) Really, I know you guys are just playing but it's not an appropriate mechanism for (...) (21 years ago, 9-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo)
 
  Re: S P A C E ! !
 
(...) How is the following not plain text? It's encoded, but so are 8-bit posts ('quoted-printable'). It's not binaries, and not created using any binary-to-text utilities - it's just text-to-text conversion. 576520616C6C206B6E6F...4841480A0A (21 years ago, 9-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo)
 
  Re: S P A C E ! !
 
(...) (snip) (...) (snip) OK guys, knock it off, please... I refer you to point 8 of the Discussion Group ToS: (URL) (do not) Post non-plain-text content such as HTML, multi-part MIME messages, or so-called “binaries” including but not limited to: (...) (21 years ago, 9-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo)
 
  Re: S P A C E ! !
 
(...) 54686520736164207061...697327206D (21 years ago, 9-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo)
 
  Re: S P A C E ! !
 
(...) 01001011 01101110 01101111 01110111 01101001 01101110 01100111 00100000 01010100 01101111 01100100 01100100 00100111 01110011 01100001 01110100 01110100 01100101 01101110 01110100 01101001 01101111 01101110 00100000 01110100 01101111 01100100 (...) (21 years ago, 9-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo)
 
  Re: S P A C E ! !
 
(...) 01100101 01110010 00111111 (...) 01110111011001010110...1000000110 (21 years ago, 9-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo)
 
  Re: S P A C E ! !
 
(...) 01010111 01101000 01100001 01110100 01101001 01110011 01110011 01101111 01110101 01110011 01100101 01101100 01100101 01110011 01110011 01100001 01100010 01101111 01110101 01110100 01100001 01100010 01101001 01101110 01100001 01110010 01111001 (...) (21 years ago, 9-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo)
 
  Re: S P A C E ! !
 
Ivan claims to speak thus: ---...--- It's almost 1 in the morning and I have to wake up at 5, but instead I'm here coding this rather useless ASCII to binary converter! Oh and Derek, I love the space effect in that last post! Well done! Ivan There (...) (21 years ago, 9-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo)
 
  Re: Best SB Set Names
 
(...) ummm, I've not !ONCE! asked lar to x-post anything! ever. I was doing more a mock, that he finally COULD x-post. Chris King. well my bush of home grown, being dehydrated, chilli peppers are calling me. (21 years ago, 9-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo)
 
  Re: S P A C E ! !
 
01001001 01110100 00100111 01110011 01100001 01101100 01101101 01101111 01110011 01110100 00110001 01101001 01101110 01110100 01101000 01100101 01101101 01101111 01110010 01101110 01101001 01101110 01100111 01100001 01101110 01100100 01001001 (...) (21 years ago, 9-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo)
 
  Re: Best SB Set Names
 
(...) Richard Grieco? Sorry. Calum (21 years ago, 9-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo)
 
  Re: Best SB Set Names
 
(...) Must admit I find it rather funny that Chris-“Death to TOS”-Magno has Larry-“So proper he has to x-post everything to its correct NG”-Pieniazek as his sidekick and an all-purpose lackey. Ivan - "Non-Flammable" is not a challenge (21 years ago, 9-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo)
 
  Re: Best SB Set Names
 
(...) The "king" needs a *different KIND of help* than "you people" do. Hope that clears things up for you Ivan. BTW, is there any truth to the rumor that you're known as Ivan the Terrible in certain circles/quarters/rooms? XFUT (...) (21 years ago, 9-Oct-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.off-topic.test.foo)
 
  Re: Best SB Set Names
 
(...) Guess not. Might be related to the fact that FUTs don't seem to be propegated to people using email. (21 years ago, 9-Oct-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.off-topic.test.foo)
 
  Re: Best SB Set Names
 
finally, you managed to do something right. Chris King. (...) (21 years ago, 9-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR