 | | Re: whoop de doo
|
| (...) Well, he violated: "10. (do not) Post or re-post a message excessively" (from Lugnet terms of use) -Shiri (25 years ago, 6-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
| | | | | Re: whoop de doo
|
| (...) Sure, but: lugnet.off-topic.test (group): Off-topic, non-discussion area for testing and/or experimenting with newsreader setup/configuration, signature files, line wrapping, etc. (25 years ago, 6-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
| | | | | Re: whoop de doo
|
| (...) use) (...) I was just pointing out what Todd's POV probably is. -Shiri (25 years ago, 6-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
| | | | | Re: whoop de doo
|
| (...) Yeah, I'm just pointing out mine. For example, if I were experimenting heavily with the rating system, I might want to have a bunch of posts I could do whatever I want with. And posting a bunch of stuff to .off-topic.test seems like the (...) (25 years ago, 6-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
| | | | | Re: whoop de doo
|
| (...) Step 1 is to disable his posting ability to that group ASAP -- nobody needs to post 108 messages -- many all the same exact copy -- to test any of those things shown above. If it turns out later that Alan had a legitimate reason to do what he (...) (25 years ago, 6-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.test, lugnet.admin.terms)
| | | | | Re: whoop de doo
|
| (...) Ahh, but you're special. No doubts in my mind that if you or DanB or JeremyS (for example) had done it, you'd've had a good solid reason. And if you weren't just bored and playing around, I'll bet you'd mention ahead of time that you were (...) (25 years ago, 6-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.test, lugnet.admin.terms)
| |
