To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.testOpen lugnet.off-topic.test in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Testing / *5101 (-20)
  test post 123
 
testing 123 me (22 years ago, 29-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
 
  Re: test
 
(...) test more (22 years ago, 29-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
 
  test
 
test (22 years ago, 28-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
 
  testing
 
This is a test of the emergency broadcast system.....this is only a test.. (I'm sure that one hasn't been done before) --AltReality (22 years ago, 27-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo)
 
  test #3
 
test#3 (22 years ago, 27-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
 
  test
 
test again (22 years ago, 27-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
 
  test
 
testing... what else? (22 years ago, 27-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
 
  Re: CANCEL ME, BABY!!!
 
(...) More or less (22 years ago, 27-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
 
  Re: CANCEL ME, BABY!!!
 
(...) THEN I WILL HAVE TO CANCEL YOU, TOO!!! Muwhaha.... ____ (22 years ago, 22-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
 
  Re: CANCEL ME, BABY!!!
 
(...) But what if some fool replies to it first? Dave! (22 years ago, 22-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
 
  (canceled)
 
 
  Test
 
This is just a test. Let see how long long long long long long long lines ares wrapped. Ok (22 years ago, 21-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
 
  Re: Test
 
Wierd... Just tried that post twice in market.theory, and it failed twice until I changed it from FTX to plain text, after which it worked. Otherwise it got a '0' back from the newsserver. Odd. DaveE (22 years ago, 20-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.test, FTX)
 
  Re: Test
 
(...) I remember doing calculations long ago, using myself as a 'rough guess' and coming up with pathetically small numbers. Something like 1-2% of Lego's sales; and that was based on roughly how many AFOLs were 'out there', how much Lego said it (...) (22 years ago, 20-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.test, FTX)
 
  Re: test of FUT override
 
(...) "This is the type of conversation that can only end in one of us dead..." or "Well I never!!" "And you never will, either..." One's from Babylon 5, the other is from M*A*S*H (22 years ago, 20-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
 
  Re: test of FUT override
 
(...) Hmmmm - shouldn't it be X-Original-Followup-To? Would it send out notifications to test.bar, after the FUT's updated? Or does the post silently appear? Of course, this doesn't affect mail/news readers, but I don't think you can do anything (...) (22 years ago, 20-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.test.bar, lugnet.admin.nntp)
 
  Re: test of FUT override
 
In lugnet.off-topic.test.bar, David Koudys wrote: (same insults as before) Test whether ForceFUT stays through a cancel cycle. (it did) (22 years ago, 20-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
 
  Re: test of FUT override
 
In lugnet.off-topic.test.bar, David Koudys wrote: (some rather typical blather) Test ForceFUT to just plain old test (22 years ago, 20-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
 
  Re: test of FUT override
 
(...) Foo back at yoo. -Tim (22 years ago, 20-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo)
 
  Re: test of FUT override
 
(...) So to conclude, we have 3(fut)*5(blah) I'd say divide by foo and were just about there... Dave K (22 years ago, 20-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.test.bar)  


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR