Foo : 294


Off-Topic / Testing / Foo / 294	293 \| 295

Subject:	Re: test of FUT override
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.test.foo
Followup-To:	lugnet.off-topic.fun
Original-Followup-To:
Date:	Tue, 20 Jul 2004 04:17:27 GMT
Viewed:	1938 times

In lugnet.off-topic.test.bar, David Koudys wrote: > In lugnet.off-topic.test.bar, Larry Pieniazek wrote: > > In lugnet.off-topic.test.foo, Todd Lehman wrote: > > > fut fut fut blah blah blah > > > > I'll see your "fut fut fut blah blah blah" and raise you a blah blah. > > > > fut fut fut blah blah blah blah blah. > > So to conclude, we have 3(fut)*5(blah) > > I'd say divide by foo and were just about there... > > Dave K Foo back at yoo. -Tim

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: test of FUT override
(...) So to conclude, we have 3(fut)*5(blah) I'd say divide by foo and were just about there... Dave K (20 years ago, 20-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.test.bar)

3 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search