|
|
 | | (canceled)
|
| | | | | | Test
|
| This is just a test. Let see how long long long long long long long lines ares wrapped. Ok (22 years ago, 21-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
| | | | | Re: Test
|
| Wierd... Just tried that post twice in market.theory, and it failed twice until I changed it from FTX to plain text, after which it worked. Otherwise it got a '0' back from the newsserver. Odd. DaveE (22 years ago, 20-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.test, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Test
|
| (...) I remember doing calculations long ago, using myself as a 'rough guess' and coming up with pathetically small numbers. Something like 1-2% of Lego's sales; and that was based on roughly how many AFOLs were 'out there', how much Lego said it (...) (22 years ago, 20-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.test, FTX)
| | | | | Re: test of FUT override
|
| (...) "This is the type of conversation that can only end in one of us dead..." or "Well I never!!" "And you never will, either..." One's from Babylon 5, the other is from M*A*S*H (22 years ago, 20-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
| | | | | Re: test of FUT override
|
| (...) Hmmmm - shouldn't it be X-Original-Followup-To? Would it send out notifications to test.bar, after the FUT's updated? Or does the post silently appear? Of course, this doesn't affect mail/news readers, but I don't think you can do anything (...) (22 years ago, 20-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.test.bar, lugnet.admin.nntp)
| | | | | Re: test of FUT override
|
| In lugnet.off-topic.test.bar, David Koudys wrote: (same insults as before) Test whether ForceFUT stays through a cancel cycle. (it did) (22 years ago, 20-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
| | | | | Re: test of FUT override
|
| In lugnet.off-topic.test.bar, David Koudys wrote: (some rather typical blather) Test ForceFUT to just plain old test (22 years ago, 20-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
| | | | | Re: test of FUT override
|
| (...) Foo back at yoo. -Tim (22 years ago, 20-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo)
| | | | | Re: test of FUT override
|
| (...) So to conclude, we have 3(fut)*5(blah) I'd say divide by foo and were just about there... Dave K (22 years ago, 20-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.test.bar)
|
|
