|
|
 | | Re: First Timer
|
| (...) Are--are--are you sure? Should I, um, um, buy any eh, poke-poke-poke... Central Park... um, should I-- I--I buy any canned goods? Or cereal? Should they be, um, plastic or edible? :-) Y2K has been a success, why can't this be?! -Shiri (26 years ago, 6-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
| | | | | Re: Deedle deedle doo
|
| (...) (26 years ago, 6-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
| | | | | Re: Deedle deedle doo
|
| (...) abbuw abbuw abbuw (26 years ago, 6-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
| | | | | Re: First Timer
|
| (...) Why hello. (26 years ago, 6-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
| | | | | Re: IGNORE: yet another test message
|
| (...) Yep, that's true! I love the test postings, 'specially when people try to be funny so the test will not go unnoticed... well someone will notice it anyhow! "Big brother is watching you"... ;-) -Shiri (26 years ago, 6-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
| | | | | Re: IGNORE: yet another test message
|
| (...) Yes, it's true. Shiri and I agree that .test messages can be fun to read sometimes. I am way, way behind in reading .test postings--been at least two months since I have had a good luck around here. So, test away, Shiri and I will be reading. (...) (26 years ago, 6-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
| | | | | Re: just testing...
|
| and still... Patrick Burke wrote in message ... (...) (26 years ago, 6-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
| | | | | testing...
|
| test (26 years ago, 4-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
| | | | | just testing...
|
| still testing (26 years ago, 4-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
| | | | | POST vs. GET (was: Re: IGNORE: yet another test message)
|
| (...) the defined API). I just added a thingy to reject GET requests. (You still needed your member sign-in cookie with the GET, of course.) GETs are undesirable in this case because the raw data winds up in the httpd logs. Now if I can only figure (...) (26 years ago, 6-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.test, lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
