To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.geekOpen lugnet.off-topic.geek in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Geek / 900
899  |  901
Subject: 
Re: Dumb, stupid question
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.geek
Date: 
Tue, 21 Dec 1999 04:45:50 GMT
Reply-To: 
mattdm@mattdm./stopspam/org
Viewed: 
292 times
  
Erin Windross <dwindross@pacificcoast.net> wrote:
Several ment the number seven, until recently have I learned it means any
number below seven)

Doesn't mean 1. Or 0. Or -1.

Probably also doesn't mean 2.

Could mean 7, if they're distinct. Or 100, under some circumstances.

--
Matthew Miller                      --->                  mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us                       --->             http://quotes-r-us.org/



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Dumb, stupid question
 
(...) Thanks, I'll try to keep that in mind when I read your name.(I always pronounced Todds name as Layman, and yours as Penzak. I used to think the word Several ment the number seven, until recently have I learned it means any number below seven) (...) (25 years ago, 21-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)

21 Messages in This Thread:








Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR