 | | Re: On the recursive subdivision of two-dimensional food items —Stephen F. Roberts
|
| | | On 02:13 16-08-04, Todd Lehman wrote (...) <MUCH GEEKAGE SNIPPED> (...) Me thinks someone was over thinking this a bit too much.... excellent geek analysis... Note that this algorithm doesn't apply well to liquids in bottles or (20 years ago, 16-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: On the recursive subdivision of two-dimensional food items —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | (...) Well let's just say it was a thinking and reflecting kind of evening. --Todd (20 years ago, 16-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: On the recursive subdivision of two-dimensional food items —Mark Bellis
|
| | | | (...) The easiest way to divide up a bottle of liquid would be to use the spirit measure, though this is not recursive: Repeat Attach measure to bottle Repeat pour drink drink Until bottle empty Seek another bottle Until too drunk to lift glass not (...) (20 years ago, 18-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: On the recursive subdivision of two-dimensional food items —Jason J. Railton
|
| | | | (...) True. There's always the square equivalent where you cut into nine and remove the centre square. Sorry, back up. That's just too weird to contemplate. Cutting a slice of bread into ninths, not quarters? I mean, even the triangularists still (...) (20 years ago, 20-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | |
