 | | Opera Software browser (was: Re: MSIE5 security hole) —Todd Lehman
|
| | | (...) Hmm, it's kind of crippled without cookie support, isn't it. Not that I'm a fan of the way so many sites mis-use cookies, but when they're used the right way, cookies are a goshdarn excellent browser feature. --Todd [followups to .publish] (25 years ago, 2-Sep-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.publish)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Opera Software browser (was: Re: MSIE5 security hole) —Ed Jones
|
| | | | | (...) Darn, saw the subject and thought I was headed toward a composing program. Visions of Verdi, Bellini, Donizetti, Wagner, Strauss and Puccini were dancing in my head. Bummer. Ed "still fighting with one hand" Jones (25 years ago, 2-Sep-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Opera Software browser (was: Re: MSIE5 security hole) —Mike Stanley
|
| | | | | (...) I'm no Opera advocate, I just like the stuff about it that works. And enough about it works that I almost bought it. Let them fix a few more important things and I'll stop using IE for good. (25 years ago, 2-Sep-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Opera Software browser (was: Re: MSIE5 security hole) —Amos Bieler
|
| | | | (...) I hope it has cookie support. Otherwise, there's somthing kinda scary aboutthis COOKIES.DAT in my user directory! Seriously, I have Opera 3.60 and it works beautifully. It has JavaScript with an amazing feature: You can have JavaScript on for (...) (25 years ago, 2-Sep-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Opera Software browser (was: Re: MSIE5 security hole) —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) Hey! I see a cookies.dat file in my user directory too. That's very interesting. Hmm. Darn thing's binary (boo! hiss!) but anyway, as far as I can tell, the cookies feature in Opera 3.60 is forgen borken. If you know how to make 'em work, I'd (...) (25 years ago, 2-Sep-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Opera Software browser (was: Re: MSIE5 security hole) —Amos Bieler
|
| | | | (...) What sites are these? I'll try them with mine. (...) Mine does it just fine. How were these tags used? It passed this short test with flying black-on-grey: <HTML><HEAD><TITLE>Definition List Test</TITLE></HEAD> <BODY> <DL> <DT>Spoon</DT> <DD>A (...) (25 years ago, 7-Sep-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Opera Software browser (was: Re: MSIE5 security hole) —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) I can't give out the URLs because they're private LUGNET-admin pages, but one that you could test which uses the same cookie-storage code is this: (URL) guess is: If a website named www.foo.com sends a cookie labled .foo.com, that Opera (...) (25 years ago, 8-Sep-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Opera Software browser (was: Re: MSIE5 security hole) —Amos Bieler
|
| | | | (...) Could you modify your cookies so that it used www.lugnet.com instead of .lugnet.com? So that at least _one_ site is compatible with Opera ;^) I'm getting pretty sick of typing my name/address in the web interface. (...) It seems to do unclosed (...) (25 years ago, 12-Sep-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | |
