 | | Re: Matrix Weapon Tech
|
|
(...) The same way they used the Nebbie's without knocking that ship out (which was a pretty impressive feat, considering how chewed the ship was by the time they used it. Since it's equipped with an EMP generator, one would assume it's got some (...) (21 years ago, 30-Jul-03, to lugnet.space, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Matrix Weapon Tech
|
|
(...) Prior to the release of Animatrix, I would have said it was just the EMP generator, since Trinity (I think) clearly stated that it was their only defense against the Sentinels. Even with the release of Animatrix showing the Osiris using (...) (21 years ago, 30-Jul-03, to lugnet.space, lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Matrix Weapon Tech
|
|
(...) Well that's the thing. It's a last resort sort of weapon in the movies. I'm sure every ship has it but it's a bad idea to use it too soon (as referenced in Reloaded) (URL) j o n (URL) zemi.net> (URL) the-shipyard> (21 years ago, 30-Jul-03, to lugnet.space, lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Matrix Weapon Tech
|
|
(...) I actually totally forgot about seeing this. After seeing Dreamcatcher I've been trying to forget about it ever since. Maybe my brain accidentally lumped "Osiris" in with it. This is perfect. Thank you! (...) And I've seen this one as well. (...) (21 years ago, 30-Jul-03, to lugnet.space, lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Matrix Weapon Tech
|
|
"Jon Palmer" <jon@zemi.net> wrote in message news:HIu8Jv.1zts@lugnet.com... (...) was (...) sort of (...) would put (...) hovership. >:D (...) You're not going to put the EMP on it, are you? How would you use it without kocking out your own (...) (21 years ago, 30-Jul-03, to lugnet.space, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Matrix Weapon Tech
|
|
(...) The (URL) Animatrix> is a good resource. The first Animatrix film, "Flight of the Osiris," has the hovership Osiris combatting Sentinels. They used machine gun turrets, similar to the laser turrets that Han & Luke use to shoot down TIE (...) (21 years ago, 30-Jul-03, to lugnet.space, lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
|
| |
| | Matrix Weapon Tech
|
|
To my knowledge all we've seen is the EMP used in the first movie. There was also the laser thing that Tank used on Cypher, but I don't know if that sort of thing could be mounted on the exterior of the ship. I don't own the first movie, so I might (...) (21 years ago, 30-Jul-03, to lugnet.space, lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
|
| |
| | Laptop batteries
|
|
I'm looking for somewhere to get a replacement battery for my Dell Inspiron 8100 laptop. If it were a perfect world, it would be here in the Chicago area and I could pick it up before I fly out of here on Saturday. But, I'm not holding my breath. (...) (21 years ago, 24-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | CD Burn help
|
|
Hi all, I was wondering if any of you knew how to burn a CD in the Kodak Picture CD format using Nero. I mean, I know i can burn pictures to a cd, but how do i get a dvd player to recognize it as a Kodak PCD? Do I have to alter pic size, bit depth, (...) (21 years ago, 21-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Computer Recycling (was Re: Huge Sale @ Atlanta LEGO Outlet)
|
|
(...) Well be sure to introduce yourself and ask questions, that's what the open house is all about. (...) Computer recycling? Normally I just set my old stuff on the curb the day before trash day and someone tends to drive by and pick it all up (...) (21 years ago, 9-Jul-03, to lugnet.loc.us.ga, lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Regular Expression help?
|
|
(...) David, Thanks for this additional approach. I thought that I had tried something similar to this, but I must have gotten some portion of it wrong, as I could get no matches in my data. Thanks again, -Andy Lynch (21 years ago, 9-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Regular Expression help?
|
|
(...) Ah. I had my little O'Reilly Perl 5 pocket reference out and was playing with "zero-width positive/negative look-ahead/behind assertion"s before I began this thread, but since I haven't used them before I wasn't sure how they worked. In any (...) (21 years ago, 8-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Regular Expression help?
|
|
(...) Woops, yep (...) ? Wouldn't it not, since it matches on the double quote first? IE it would match alt="........." as a single dealy? I'll test.... Ran as a test: foreach( '<img src="foo.jpg">',# matches '<img border="" src="foo.jpg">',# no (...) (21 years ago, 8-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Regular Expression help?
|
|
(...) ^ missing "*" here --------/ (...) wouldn't this also break on this: <img src="1.jpg" alt="Some Text with Contrived B=something in it"> :) But other than that, good idea to look at what's valid :) (21 years ago, 8-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Regular Expression help?
|
|
(...) For *BORDER* tags, you're in luck: /<img(\s+[^bB]\w+=("...|\S*))*>/i But that is on the (valid?) presumption that the ONLY attribute for an <img> tag that starts with the letter "B" is "BORDER". I suppose I could be wrong what with all the (...) (21 years ago, 8-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Regular Expression help?
|
|
(...) doh, of course. However, unless your editor allows to do negative lookaheads, I don't think you can use a regexp to find a missing border tag. (...) hmmm. One way to do it would be to replace all the img tags that DO have the border attribute, (...) (21 years ago, 8-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Regular Expression help?
|
|
(...) I think this will only find img tags that have a border property, but I need to find img tags that are missing the border property. (...) Thanks for the kind offer. :-) I suspect once we can isolate the lines that are offensive that it will (...) (21 years ago, 8-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Regular Expression help?
|
|
(...) oh! well, seems that it has a similar syntax :) Anyway, the actual regexp here is: <img[^>]+border="[0-9]*" Hope that will help. By the way, if you need to edit hundreds of lines, using an automated process might save you hours and hours of (...) (21 years ago, 8-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Regular Expression help?
|
|
(...) Hmmm, actually I am using an html editor that allows extended searches using regular expressions, so I am somewhat limited by what that allows. I should have been more specific. (...) That looks like it would work nicely, but as I said above, (...) (21 years ago, 8-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Regular Expression help?
|
|
(...) I'm assuming you mean perl's regexps? (...) I should note that you probably will have more reliable code if you didn't use a regexp here, but instead parse the html with one of the HTML::* modules... but, regexp is more fun :) (...) how about (...) (21 years ago, 8-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
