Subject:
|
Re: Regular Expression help?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.geek
|
Date:
|
Tue, 8 Jul 2003 17:51:08 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
375 times
|
| |
|
|
Dan Boger wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 05:05:17PM +0000, Andy Lynch wrote:
> > Dan Boger wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 03:39:54PM +0000, Andy Lynch wrote:
> > > > Hello Regular Expression Geeks.
> > >
> > > I'm assuming you mean perl's regexps?
> >
> > Hmmm, actually I am using an html editor that allows extended
> > searches using regular expressions, so I am somewhat limited by what
> > that allows. I should have been more specific.
>
> oh! well, seems that it has a similar syntax :)
>
> Anyway, the actual regexp here is:
>
> <img[^>]+border="[0-9]*"
>
> Hope that will help.
I think this will only find img tags that have a border property, but I need
to find img tags that are missing the border property.
>
> By the way, if you need to edit hundreds of lines, using an automated
> process might save you hours and hours of time. Drop me an email if
> you want some help with that :)
Thanks for the kind offer. :-) I suspect once we can isolate the lines that
are offensive that it will only be a very few that actually need to be
changed. Also, the same editor that allows us to use RegExpr for searching
will allow us to use a syntax similar to perl for replacement text. Of
course I need to be able to capture the offending text to be able to
creatively replace it! hehehe.
Thanks again.
-Andy Lynch
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Regular Expression help?
|
| (...) doh, of course. However, unless your editor allows to do negative lookaheads, I don't think you can use a regexp to find a missing border tag. (...) hmmm. One way to do it would be to replace all the img tags that DO have the border attribute, (...) (21 years ago, 8-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Regular Expression help?
|
| (...) oh! well, seems that it has a similar syntax :) Anyway, the actual regexp here is: <img[^>]+border="[0-9]*" Hope that will help. By the way, if you need to edit hundreds of lines, using an automated process might save you hours and hours of (...) (21 years ago, 8-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
