 | | Re: A Change —Dan Boger
| | | | Wow - that was the hardest post to read in a text terminal. SO MANY MS-specific characters, it's like half the post was '?' signs! for instance: (...) wow. Dan (posted via email auth. big deal, imo) (22 years ago, 8-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: A Change —Richard Noeckel
| | | | | (...) Hi, I'm using the ISO-8859-1 (Latin 1) superset; and I bet that every newsreader written or updated in the last five years can handle that too. But usually only Windows machines can handle the additional characters in Codepage 1252. I don’t do (...) (22 years ago, 8-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.general)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: A Change —Matthew Miller
| | | | | | (...) How should anything know that your message is using this "codepage 1252"? The message headers specify that you're using the standard iso-8859-1 charset -- but you're not. You've got a bunch of characters using mappings that are reserved for (...) (22 years ago, 8-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: A Change —Dan Boger
| | | | | (...) huh, funny how that works. I'm running mutt that was compiled on April 20th, 2003. So yes, I'm sure it _can_ handle all the current standards. (...) you mean only windows machines ignore the standards, and show characters that don't really (...) (22 years ago, 8-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | | | |
