To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.geekOpen lugnet.off-topic.geek in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Geek / 4238
4237  |  4239
Subject: 
Re: Backwards Compatibility (Was Calling all Meta-commands)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.off-topic.geek
Followup-To: 
lugnet.off-topic.geek
Date: 
Sat, 22 Mar 2003 01:02:31 GMT
Viewed: 
45 times
  
On Sat, Mar 22, 2003 at 12:26:39AM +0000, Steve Bliss wrote:
In lugnet.cad.dev, Dan Boger wrote:
sure, that works almost as well as {}.  It's the _lack_ of any
punctuation that bothered me there.

You program in *Perl*.  Of course you think it's good to always have
punctuation.  You probably think more punctuation == better. ;)

you mean

$puctuation++ > ! $puctuation ? $goodness++ : $goodness-- ;

?

--
Dan Boger
dan@peeron.com



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Backwards Compatibility (Was Calling all Meta-commands)
 
(...) ROFL. I'm sorry, I can't reply in kind. My brain is too fogged. Steve (22 years ago, 22-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Backwards Compatibility (Was Calling all Meta-commands)
 
(...) Dan, You program in *Perl*. Of course you think it's good to always have punctuation. You probably think more punctuation == better. ;) Steve (22 years ago, 22-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)

154 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR