To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.geekOpen lugnet.off-topic.geek in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Geek / 4239
4238  |  4240
Subject: 
Re: Backwards Compatibility (Was Calling all Meta-commands)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.geek
Date: 
Sat, 22 Mar 2003 05:02:21 GMT
Viewed: 
5467 times
  
In lugnet.cad.dev, Dan Boger wrote:

> On Sat, Mar 22, 2003 at 12:26:39AM +0000, Steve Bliss wrote:
> > In lugnet.cad.dev, Dan Boger wrote:
> > > sure, that works almost as well as {}.  It's the _lack_ of any
> > > punctuation that bothered me there.
> > 
> > You program in *Perl*.  Of course you think it's good to always have
> > punctuation.  You probably think more punctuation == better. ;)
> 
> you mean
> 
> $puctuation++ > ! $puctuation ? $goodness++ : $goodness-- ;

ROFL.

I'm sorry, I can't reply in kind.  My brain is too fogged.

Steve



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Backwards Compatibility (Was Calling all Meta-commands)
 
(...) you mean $puctuation++ > ! $puctuation ? $goodness++ : $goodness-- ; ? (24 years ago, 22-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.off-topic.geek)

154 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR